How to Run a Heuristic Audit on Your Current EHR Platform

EHR platforms are vital to modern care, yet many clinicians describe them as cumbersome and unintuitive. Recent research links EHR usability scores to burnout; each one‑point increase in usability decreases the odds of physician burnout by roughly 3 %. Surveys show that clinicians give the average EHR a usability score of about 45.9, far below the industry‑average score of 68 and much lower than commonplace applications like Google. Poor usability fuels cognitive overload, increased documentation time, and dissatisfaction, and these issues can lead clinicians to cut back on clinical practice.

A heuristic audit offers a practical way to surface usability problems in your current system without the cost of large‑scale user studies. This step‑by‑step guide explains how EHR managers, product owners, and UX leads can conduct a heuristic evaluation that uncovers issues and points the way toward a more intuitive, clinician‑friendly EHR.

Why Use a Heuristic Evaluation?

A heuristic evaluation is an expert inspection of the user interface using a set of usability principles (heuristics). Unlike long‑term studies or large usability tests, heuristic evaluations are relatively inexpensive and can uncover both major and minor problems. 

• The technique typically involves three to five evaluators, which research shows can identify more than half of the usability problems. 
• Evaluators note where heuristics are violated and rate the severity of each issue on a scale, 1 for a cosmetic problem and 4 for a catastrophic problem. 
• This small‑scale, expert‑led approach is particularly attractive when you need quick feedback on existing EHR screens and workflows.
• Heuristic evaluations are also important from a regulatory perspective. 
• The NIST EHR Usability Protocol describes expert evaluation of an EHR interface as a key step in ensuring that applications are free from critical usability issues and support error‑free interaction. 

In a study evaluating a clinical decision support system, evaluators used a checklist based on Nielsen’s 10 heuristics to rate each violation’s severity. 

The researchers concluded that heuristic evaluations reduce the time and cost needed to establish usability and help organizations create transparent reporting protocols required by the 21st Century Cures Act

Understand the Heuristics

While many heuristic sets exist, the principles below are widely used in health‑IT evaluations. They provide a common vocabulary for discussing problems and are easily adapted to clinical workflows:

Use these heuristics as a starting point; you may add domain‑specific rules (e.g., medication safety checks) or organization policies. The AHRQ report lists additional heuristics like reversible actions, feedback, language, and documentation that are particularly relevant to clinical systems.

Step‑by‑Step Guide to Auditing Your EHR

The following process synthesizes human‑factors guidance from NIST and practical advice from UX practitioners. It’s designed for health‑IT directors, EHR product owners, clinical application managers, and UX leads overseeing hospital, health‑system, or ambulatory EHR platforms.

1 Define scope and objectives

Begin by pinpointing which parts of the EHR need evaluation, order entry, clinical documentation, medication reconciliation, or patient portals. 

• Set clear goals: are you looking to reduce documentation time, improve navigation, or increase adoption? 
• For example, if physicians complain about note creation taking too long, focus the audit on the note editor and related templates. 
• Defining the scope ensures that evaluators don’t get overwhelmed and that findings are actionable.

2 Know your end‑users and assemble a cross‑functional team

Identify the user groups (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, medical assistants, and administrative staff) and consider their workflows. Recruit three to five evaluators with human‑computer interaction (HCI) or UX expertise and include clinicians who understand the context. 

The AHRQ guidance recommends a small set of experts because two or more usability experts can identify over 50 % of interface problems. In the JMIR study, six HCI experts, including nurses and engineers, evaluated the system. Ensure your evaluators represent both clinical and technical perspectives.

3 Select or tailor your heuristics

Choose a list of heuristics appropriate for healthcare. Nielsen’s 10 heuristics provide a strong foundation; augment them with health‑specific principles such as clinical workflow alignment, data integrity, patient safety checks, and error escalation paths. 

Consider guidance from NIST’s user‑centered design process, which emphasizes designing systems that are efficient, effective, and satisfying to the user. Adapting heuristics ensures your audit covers aspects such as medication safety, order verification, and communication across care teams.

4 Create representative tasks and scenarios

Develop realistic scenarios that reflect the daily work of clinicians. 

• For example, tasks might include ordering a medication, documenting an encounter, retrieving lab results, or completing a patient hand‑off. 
• Each evaluator should independently explore the EHR at least twice using these scenarios. 
• Provide relevant patient data so evaluators can follow the workflow without improvisation. 
• Structuring tasks helps evaluators focus on workflow friction rather than exploring randomly.

5 Perform the heuristic evaluation

Have each expert inspect the interface independently. Evaluators note every usability issue, the violated heuristic, and its severity. AHRQ suggests using a 1–4 scale where 1 = cosmetic problem, 4 = catastrophic problem needing immediate fix. 

Encourage evaluators to add comments and screenshots; this rich data will facilitate later analysis. Avoid group discussions during individual evaluations to prevent bias. When evaluating complex workflows, break them into smaller steps to ensure thorough coverage.

6 Consolidate findings and rate severity

After individual sessions, combine the evaluators’ lists. Group similar issues, tally the number of times an issue was mentioned, and assign a severity rating based on consensus. 

• Use analytics to calculate the average severity per heuristic or workflow. 
• The JMIR study reported mean severity scores ranging from 0.66 for flexibility/efficiency to 2.00 for user control and error prevention. 

This type of data highlights areas needing priority attention. Present the aggregated results in a simple report that lists issues by severity, the violated heuristic, and potential impact on patient safety.

7 Prioritize and plan improvements

Not all issues are equal. Use severity, frequency, and impact on clinical workflow to prioritize. Focus on high‑severity problems that hinder patient care, such as unclear error messages, mismatched order sets, or navigation loops. Map these issues to proposed design changes or configuration adjustments. 

NIST’s EHR Usability Protocol emphasizes ensuring the user interface is free of critical usability issues before deployment; apply this principle by addressing catastrophic and major issues first.

8 Share results and comply with reporting requirements

Document the process, findings, and recommendations clearly. Include screenshots and an explanation of the violated heuristics. According to researchers, heuristic evaluations can help organizations develop transparent reporting protocols for usability, which is important for regulatory compliance under Title IV of the 21st Century Cures Act. Share the report with leadership, clinicians, and vendors. Use it to inform vendor negotiations or internal development roadmaps.

9 Iterate and measure progress

Usability auditing is not a one‑time exercise. Implement changes and re‑evaluate. Combine expert‑based heuristics with user‑based evaluations such as usability testing or surveys. 

Iterative testing is critical: research shows that poor EHR usability increases clinicians’ cognitive workload, fatigue, and burnout, while improved usability reduces burnout odds. 

Track metrics such as task completion time, number of clicks, error rates, satisfaction scores, and adoption rates before and after improvements.

Additional Tips for EHR Managers and UX Leads

• Align with clinical workflows: Ensure your heuristics reference common workflows (e.g., medication orders, referrals, telehealth scheduling). Look for mismatches between the system’s structure and clinicians’ mental models.
• Focus on error prevention: Many EHR errors are due to mismatched data entry fields, confusing default values, or a lack of confirmation dialogues. Heuristic audits help identify such issues before they lead to patient harm.
• Involve frontline users early: Even though expert evaluations require evaluators with usability expertise, involve clinicians in defining scenarios and reviewing recommendations. This builds trust and ensures that improvements address real pain points.
• Embed user‑centered design processes: NIST emphasizes adopting a user‑centered design process that makes EHRs efficient, effective, and satisfying. Incorporate usability evaluation into your development lifecycle, not just as a one‑off audit
  
• Promote vendor partnership: Share heuristic findings with your EHR vendor. Vendors may have configuration options or roadmaps that address issues. Use evidence from the audit to advocate for enhancements that matter to your clinicians.

Related: Building Patient Portals on Top of OpenEMR: Tech Stack, UX, and Authentication

Improve EHR Usability with CapMinds’ Tailored Solutions

Improving the usability of your EHR platform doesn’t have to be overwhelming. 

By leveraging a structured heuristic audit, you can pinpoint key usability issues and take targeted action. 

However, executing these changes requires more than just a quick fix; it demands an ongoing commitment to improving the clinician experience. 

CapMinds can help you streamline your EHR system and ensure it delivers optimal results for your clinical teams. Our team provides the following services designed to enhance your EHR platform’s usability and overall performance:

• Custom EHR Development: Tailored solutions to meet your specific clinical workflows and needs.
• Modern UI/UX for EHR: User-friendly, intuitive interfaces designed to reduce clinician burnout and improve adoption rates.
• EHR Optimization: Enhancing usability, reducing cognitive load, and minimizing administrative burdens for improved clinician satisfaction.
• Usability Testing & Auditing: In-depth evaluations based on heuristic principles to uncover usability flaws and actionable insights.
  

Don’t let usability issues hinder your clinical operations. Reach out to CapMinds and start improving your EHR system!

Contact us